Two weeks ago the bad news started steamrolling in. First tens of thousands of deaths in Myanmar then tens of thousands of deaths in China.  The news was full of Cyclones, earthquakes, volcanoes and tornadoes. Made the twenty something deaths in the American mid-west seem like nothing.  It was almost enough to make me wonder if the Jehovah's Witnesses are right!

As the days have gone by the tens of thousands have turned into 50 thousand and 100 thousand.  It is too much, boggles the mind, too much... At the same time, I found out that a little girl, baby, really, whom I love as much as my own, was finally released from the hospital in Botswana where she has lived since her mother died when she was only three months old. She was taken to live with her great grandmother in Zimbabwe. both her parents were illegal residents of Botwsana when she was born- hoping for a better life than the chaos and massive unemployment at home in Zimbabwe.  

In the end, or in the long run, this will be celebrated as a blessing, but in her short life Hilary Shula Ndebele has never known any other home but Nyagabgwe Hospital Children's Ward.  Not a great place for a baby to grow up, you say? That's what I thought in the beginning, too.  But there she was fed and cared for, developed attachments, learned to walk.  She became a happy, slightly spoiled and mischevious toddler. Sent to Zimbabwe, to a great grandmother she's never known before, in a country in dire trouble, where political disasters foster famine and inflation beyond belief, what will happen to her. How must she feel uprooted form all she knows and everyone she loves and who love her?  She had never been outside of the hospital, before this.

Am I weeping just for her? or is it a place that I can actually feel the heartache and sorrow, when for the nearly two hundred thousand dead, it is just a kind of numbing statistic that I can't quite fathom? She who has fallen asleep in my arms, whose chubby hands I adore, whose smile brightens up my day even when I can only see it on my monitor and not in person. I fear for her, for hear physical and mental health, so little, so innocent, so sweet- yet not at all different than the tens of thousands of other little ones who have died or are now orphans- all vulnerable, to hunger, abuse, disease, starvation ,death, living a nightmare, I hope Hilary never will. 

I dream that her great grandmother adores her, loves her, soothes her fears and cuddles her to sleep.  I dream that she gets to play in the dirt, feel the rain on her arms and the sun on her face.  I dream that she looks at the green leaves and the blue sky and makes friends with the insects and birds and lizards.  That she has enough to eat and hardly ever goes hungary. That the lessons she is learning are not so much that everyone she loves and depends on leaves, but more that everywhere she goes people love her, one one person dies or leaves another appears and takes care of her, that, for the most part, this is a marvelous place and that she has been lucky, indeed.

Of course this is what I wish for every child. Hilary is just the one that has touched my life. I can imagine what she is going through, it seems real and not so overwhelming that its numbing.  I can pray for her, I might even be able to make a small difference in her life. What if each of us allowed ourselves to be touched like that by just one child? Allowed ourselves to fall in love and dream and try? would it make a difference? 

Perhaps I am fooling myself, in this, but Mother Theresa's words come to mind. Few of us get to do great things. We get to do  small things with great love. And that, my friends, makes all the difference.

For most of us who consider ourselves GREEN, Wal*Mart is a dirty word; we wouldn't be caught dead shopping there.  Although Adam Werbach's name will never become a household word, it is generating some pretty nasty epitaphs among some greenies lately. Is it because he is trying to promote BLUE instead of GREEN?  Is it because he has gone over to the other side and works with Wal*Mart? Or is it because he claims that our GREEN movement is too narrow and too negative AND that Wal*mart, its 2 million employees and it's 200 million customers, can change the world?


On April 10, 2008 Werbach, the former boy wonder head of the Sierra Club, addressed the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco.  His speech, entitled The Birth of Blue, calls for a new movement of consumers pushing for sustainability. [If you want to read the whole thing, it is posted on < http//gristmill.grist.org >.] It is one of the most fascinating. potentially hopeful, things I have read in recent years.


There is no question that Wal*Mart can change the world; it already has, for the worse! Although I suppose that may depend on your point of view. I imagine it has made the world better, or, at least, life easier, for many families struggling to make ends meet. That last aside, can enlightened self-interest apply to a giant corporation? 


Adam Werbach thinks it can and it does.  But first, we need to understand a few things.  BLUE for instance.  In his own words, Werbach says," As vast and common as the ocean, BLUE is a platform for  sustainability that goes beyond the deep, beautiful green of environmentalism. Green puts the planet at the center of the dialogue. BLUE puts people at the center.


"... Green represents the simple and inarguable wisdom of ecology: that all things are connected. BLUE brings together a broader set of human concerns, from practice to price, from nature to society. BLUE integrates all four streams of sustainability: social, cultural, economic and environmental. BLUE puts the way we treat ourselves and each other at the center of our focus." [1]


Wal*Mart is already taking the lead, according to Werbach. Wal*Mart has set three goals: 1)Produce zero waste, 2) Be powered by rewable energy, and 3) Sell only green products. And they have indtroduced PSPs, Personal Sustainablbility Practices.  Werbach worked with Wal*Mart to create  this program that encourages and creates a support structure that is simple and voluntary. PSPs are characterized by the following; Sustains the environment, Makes you happy, Affects the community, Repeatable and Takes visible action, SMART.  So far there has been tremendous success. 


Employees have done things like commit to riding a bike to work, change all their light bulbs to CLFs, care for a park, make healthy breakfasts for the kids, compost, but once these have been accomplished they have moved on to things like losing weight, getting diabetes under control and reconnecting with a daughter, as well as getting a recycling program in the local high school, dumping the deep fryer and serving  organic veggies and other healthy snacks at the ball games instead of hot dogs...


In his speech Werbach outlined the 3 desired outcomes for the BLUE movement. "First, to measurably improve the quality of life of people who join. Second, to engage as many people as possible in the effort, and third, to increase the effectiveness of their activism. The primary tactic is getting one billion people to create their own personal sustainability practices." [2] And he doesn't mean just in the US and Western European nations. China and India not only have the largest populations but the fastest growing economies.  This is especially true in China, and they are becoming increasingly aware of the costs of pollution as well as beginning to make sustainable choices and changes.


 Werbach states his long term goal as  "nothing short of building a world full of happy people contributing to a healthy planet."  He goes on to say that, "In the next five years, we need to build a billion-person movement, representing over $1 trillion in consumer buyer power -- consumers who are maintaining their PSPs and acting on them when they shop.


"To create a world full of happy people, we need to go far beyond reducing our individual carbon imprints. Happiness requires that the material, Maslovian needs of the nine billion people projected to be living on the planet by the end of the century are met, so we need enough resources for all of them." [3]

That, fellow greenies,appears to be the essential difference between BLUE and GREEN.  We in the green movement up until now have tried to promote a future that leaves the billions of people in China, India and elsewhere in the developing world, permanently underdeveloped, while urging a course for ourselves and other westerners of decreasing consumption and de-industrialization.  Meanwhile, China and India are ignoring this and zooming full speed ahead with development.  

Is it possible to meet the projected basic needs of 9 billion people and have sustainable systems in the social, cultural,economic and environmental spheres by then end of this century? If it is, I suspect that working with Wal*Mart and other huge corporations (as well as small) who voluntarily commit to substantially lowering their environmental impact, is the way to go. but only time (and billions of us making similar committments) will tell.

When you look at our beautiful home, the planet Earth, from space, you see some green, but mostly you see blue. Whose ready to sign up for a PSP?  I just committed myself to watering plants with household grey water (rinse water from the kitchen sink and our shower). AND I may just make my first trip to,( dare I say it out loud?), Wal*Mart.


1,2 and 3   < http://gristmill.grist.org >. The Birth of Blue, Adam Werbach 4/10/08