Recently in Daily Blog Category

           
From Amnesty International

"Last week, two men were hanged after being accused of inciting the post-June 12 election violence that erupted last summer in Iran. The Iranian government failed to answer one key question - how these men could have been responsible for the violence when they were being held in detention long before it even occurred?

As if this injustice wasn't enough, now the lives of 9 more men hang in the balance on similar charges. We fear some of them may be executed before February 11th - a date holding much significance in Iran and one that could signify an end to these abuses.

February 11th is known as Victory of the Revolution Day - equivalent to the Fourth of July in the United States; it is meant to symbolize liberty, independence and freedom. Authorities in Iran fear that February 11th will spark a wave of massive protests and unite Iranians in their calls for change and accountability.


That is why on February 11th we intend to do all we can to stand in solidarity with the Iranian people on this important date, but we need your help.

In the days following the contested Presidential election, Iranian authorities took aggressive measures to stifle dissent and stem the flow of information. No outside reporters were allowed in. Iranians were not allowed to freely report out.

Virtually the only way the Iranian people could expose the horrific treatment being inflicted on them was to share their stories online, using blogs and websites like Twitter and Facebook.

We expect Iranians will once again rely solely on the Internet to carry their messages during next week's expected demonstrations. That is why we are asking everyone to show their solidarity online on February 11th - whether it's on your blog, website, or social networking profile. Help us raise the voices of those calling for freedom and justice inside Iran.
Bloggers Unite: Join our network of blogger's covering Iran and the events on February 11th.
Twitter Followers: The hashtag #iranelection was one of the most widely-used in the post-election aftermath. Since the violence is still unresolved, we'll continue to tweet using this hashtag. Make sure your related tweets include: #iranelection.
Share Online: Help share the message of February 11th by adding our solidarity image to your blog, website or social networking profile.
We will be keeping a close watch over Victory of the Revolution Day events. Our collective voices can help keep high-level Iranian officials in check. If authorities yet again brutally suppress people's right to peacefully express their opinions, we will harness the power of the Internet to push right back!"

Let us join in however we can, as well as hold the Iranian people in the Light. This matters.  Your prayers matter. so be it.

Amy
<a href="http://www.amnestyusa.org/iran"><img
I got the following chain letter in via email.  I am a breast cancer survivor- not yet 5 years out.  I pass it on with a caveat and commentary:

What a lovely story! My cheeks are still wet.  But oddly enough, though I don't mind if folks want to do something by buying the stamps, I have mixed feelings about breast cancer research.  I have a conviction that the "cure" to cancer will only be found by prevention. Things like cleaning up the environment, restoring the Earth to vibrancy, and eating healthy organic food, and not all that stuff in process precooked food that isn't actually meant to be eaten (all that phood). 

The increasingly expensive and sophisticated protocols once someone has breast cancer )or any cancer, really), such as chemo and radiation therapy, will never be available to all who need them. But that's not really what I am trying to say.   What is it? What touches me about the story is the love and sweetness and caring that the children and teachers had for this principle.  It seems that either she is an extraordinary person or the children and teachers are- or both.  What I want to "fund" or spread around is that love and caring and sweetness.  But how do you do that? How do you provide the opportunities and the encouragement? how do you enable people, children, teachers and administrators who are ordinary to aspire to this kind of action?

I do believe that everyone has that which is extraordinary in them, that of God, the light, a spaciousness that can lead to this kind of behavior. Maybe just passing on the story, itself, will help.


Please read the following story...

   Like most elementary schools, it was typical to have a parade of students in and out of the health clinic throughout the day. We dispensed ice for bumps and bruises, Band-Aids for cuts, and liberal doses of sympathy and hugs.  As principal, my office was right next door to the clinic, so I often dropped in to lend a hand and help out with the hugs. I knew that for some kids, mine might be the only one they got all day.
   One morning I was putting a Band-Aid on a little girl's scraped knee. Her blonde hair was matted, and I noticed that she was shivering in her thin little sleeveless blouse. I found her a warm sweatshirt and helped her pull it on. "Thanks for taking care of me," she whispered as she climbed into my lap and snuggled up against me.
   It wasn't long after that when I ran across an unfamiliar lump under my arm. Cancer, an aggressively spreading kind, had already invaded thirteen of my lymph nodes. I pondered whether or not to tell the students about my diagnosis. The word breast seemed so hard to say out loud to them, and the word cancer seemed so frightening. When it became evident that the children were going to find out one way or another, either the straight scoop from me or possibly a garbled version from someone else, I decided to tell them myself.
   It wasn't easy to get the words out, but the empathy and concern I saw in their faces as I explained it to them told me I had made the right decision. When I gave them a chance to ask questions, they mostly wanted to know how they could help.
   I told them that what I would like best would be their letters, pictures, and prayers.
   I stood by the gym door as the children solemnly filed out. My little blonde friend darted out of line and threw herself into my arms. Then she stepped back to look up into my face. "Don't be afraid, Dr. Perry," she said earnestly, "I know you'll be back because now it's our turn to take care of you."
   No one could have ever done a better job. The kids sent me off to my first chemotherapy session with a hilarious book of nausea remedies that they had written.
   A video of every class in the school singing get-well songs accompanied me to the next chemotherapy appointment. 
   By the third visit, the nurses were waiting at the door to find out what I would bring next. It was a delicate music box that played "I Will Always Love You.."
   Even when I went into isolation at the hospital for a bone marrow transplant, the letters and pictures kept coming until they covered every wall of my room.
   Then the kids traced their hands onto colored paper, cut them out and glued them together to make a freestanding rainbow of helping hands. "I feel like I've stepped into Disneyland every time I walk into this room," my doctor laughed.
  That was even before the six-foot apple blossom tree arrived adorned with messages written on paper apples from the students and teachers. What healing comfort I found in being surrounded by these tokens of their caring..
   At long last I was well enough to return to work. As I headed up the road to the school, I was suddenly overcome by doubts. What if the kids have forgotten all about me? I wondered, What if they don't want a skinny bald principal? What if.
   I caught sight of the school marquee as I rounded the bend. "Welcome Back, Dr. Perry," it read. As I drew closer, everywhere I looked were pink ribbons - ribbons in the windows, tied on the doorknobs, even up in the trees. The children and staff wore pink ribbons, too.
   My blonde buddy was first in line to greet me. "You're back, Dr. Perry, you're back!" she called. "See, I told you we'd take care of you!"
   As I hugged her tight, in the back of my mind I faintly heard my music box playing . . . "I will always love you."

{Breast Cancer Stamp Booklet
 
 It would be wonderful if 2010  were the year a cure for breast cancer was found!!!!
 The notion that we could raise $35 million by buying a book of stamps is powerful! As you may be aware, the US Postal Service has the "Fund the Cure" stamp to help fund breast cancer research. The stamp was designed by Ethel Kessler of Bethesda , Maryland . It is important that we take a stand against this disease that affects so many of our Mothers, Sisters, Friends, Coworkers, and Spouses of Coworkers.
Instead of the normal 44 cents for a stamp, this one costs 55 cents. The additional 11 cents will go to breast cancer research A "normal" book costs $8.80. This one is only $11.00. It takes a few minutes in line at the Post Office and means so much. If all stamps are sold, it will raise an additional $35,000,000 for this vital research. Just as important as the money is our support. What a statement it would make if the stamp outsold the lottery this week. What a statement it would make that we care.

1. Go out and purchase some of these stamps.
2. E-mail your friends to do the same.

Many of us know women and their families whose lives are turned upside-down by breast cancer.
It takes so little to do so much in this drive.

We can all afford the $11.00}


While your at it, spread the love.  Don't forget that someone near you might need your caring and your smile more than you can tell.



 

 

 

How many times do we have to be told that we need to eat more vegetables? Vegans exhort us to treat animals as our siblings rather than food, nutritionists exhort us to eat less meat, more fruits and locavores act as if money grows on trees! Why can't humans be more like trees, anyway?  Why can't we get our energy, our fuel, directly from the sun like plants?!  If wishes were horses, then beggars would ride, as my Gramma would say.

As I have said previously I have tried to be a vegetarian at least twice in my life, but have come to terms with the fact that I am an omnivore- that is, like most human beings I am genetically programmed to eat a diverse menu that includes meat. When I was in my early twenties, I was profoundedly affected by a story that one of my mentors told me. I was renting the basement appartment underneath the Watson's, and Elizabeth, another Quaker preacher without a pulpit like myself, was fast becoming a friend as well as a mentor.  She was a bit older than my parents and I admired her greatly.  She served primarily vegetarian food, and told this story:

When she and her husband embarked on having a family, they had some trouble getting started and feared the worst so adopted Jean. Shortly before the adoption became legal they found they were pregnant with their, now, second child.  I have learned since then just how common a story that is, but unfortunately not a garantee for those wishing to have their biological child. But that is not the part of the story I want to tell.  Jean and John were nearly twins, but more Watson babies followed.  George and Elizabeth were new Quakers, and deeply influenced by Gandhi, so they decided that they would raise their growing family on a vegetarian diet.  When Jean was almost 4 years old one evening the  Watson family was invited to a neighbors house for supper.  Meat was served.  Jean took one bite of the meat and said, "What is this?", with astonishment.  Her mother replied, "That's meat, Jean." Then Jean said with passion, "Meat is my favorite vegetable!" Elizabeth explained they decided right then and there, that they would somethines serve meat, and did, at least as long as Jean lived with them.

So, the task before us now, as we move toward improving our own health and the health of the planet which is; how to transition to eating less meat, especially beef.  Now I love beef-especially that hormone-free, grass-fed (ridiculously expensive) stuff.  But by all reports, cows are second cousins to automobiles, emitting nearly as much CO2 as a gas guzzling car! (By the way, I believe this is also true of milk cows, as well!) We need to start thinking of meat as a side dish. Certainly the vast majority of people on earth do- or, rather, meat is a granish, a flavor in the sauce, definitely not the main dish!  Meat is reserved for special occaisions, celebrations, special guests... We could benefit greatly by following their example and seeing veggies, including salad as the main dish and meat, if we have it, as a side or a garnish, saving the 'meat as main course' for holidays and such.

About 10 years back, trying to help my daughter, Kate, who happens to have Down syndrome, controll her weight, I came accross the concept of the Healthy Plate. It has been helpful not only to her, but to me as well and now I realize it can be used to help us make this transition.  Imagine a dinner plate, or better yet, imagine one of those picnic plates that is divided up.  I always thought they were divided in order to keep the barbeque sauce from 'contaminating' the cole slaw! So, one section of the divided plate is about the size of half, and the other 2 sections are about one quarter each. We always filled the biggest section with the barbequed meat or fried chicken and then tried to squeeze the potato salad and greens into the 2 smaller spaces.  But now, we can change the rules.  Think of this as the plate you use for every meal.  The half-plate sized space is for salad and/or veggies (not potatoes). One of the smaller spaces is for protein (can be meat), and the other is for starches, like rice, noodles, bread or white potatoes.  You can have seconds (or even thirds) of the veggies/salad (the new main dish), but no seconds of the meat/protein and no seconds on the starch, unless you plan to skip dessert.  If you are trying to lose weight, have either the starch or dessert, though my daughter and I find that it works best for us to not have dessert except on weekends or special occaisions.

I think we can do this- lets start a campaign.  The Healthy Plate: Healthy Bodies/Healthy Planet.  Meat IS the new side dish, and vegetables can now take their rightful place as the main stay of the meal. This is not only healthier, but easier on the pocketbook/wallet! 

For those of us concerned about our weight, I end with my favorite quote about food:

"Never eat anything bigger than your head." Miss Piggy

Granma Sara's Buns

| | Comments (2)


Yesterday outside of Reading Terminal Market, there were 3 guys asking for spare change, but I only noticed two.  I had dropped a few coins in the one man's cup and was headed across the street to put some quarters in the cup of the one playing beautiful drum music, when I nearly bumped into the third.  I hadn't gotten my money out yet, and there was a crush of people since it was lunchtime; I barely had a chance to greet him as I swept by, let alone give him some change.  He looked at me and instead of asking for a handout saw my cocky hat with the polka-dot feather and exclaimed," that's a fine lookin' hat!" Despite myself I grinned and said, "thanks."  Now as I am writing this I wish I had gone back and given the hat to him. I don't even know where it came from- so many things get left at our house- perhaps it was Grampa George's...

 

 This is the time of year when many of us think about giving. Though it may be fiscally illogical to give more than usual when you are having financial trouble yourself, it makes a different kind of sense to be more generous when times are tough for everyone.  Did you know that research has shown that the less you have the more you give, percentage wise? This may not be true for folks who are not used to having less, but is true for those who have never had much. At this time of year it might be good to recognize the Scrouge-like tendencies of those of us accustomed to having more. The more you have the tighter you hold on to it, or so it seems.

 

A while back my mother told me a story about her mother and the depression. My grandmother, Sara, was famous for the buns she made. I remember them well myself, though this story takes place when my mother was little. They were just plain, but delicious, white bread buns, kind of like hamburger buns, but chewier.  She came from a large working class family, the oldest of 12. She had been working for wages since she was 11 or 12 herself.  She was real smart and went to school until she was 15, then got a fulltime job as a lab assistant during WWI. The owner of the lab was so impressed with how quickly and well she learned that he offered to send her back to school and pay for college- but her parents declined because they couldn't do without the income she made.

 

Sara married at 18 and had 5 kids of her own. Her husband though a charmer, I believe would be diagnosed with ADD today, but back then was called irresponsible and had a hard time keeping a job. So Sara became the most consistent breadwinner of the family. She did various things from teaching at a private elementary school to sewing fine tailored cloths in her own small business.  Of course she also did all the cooking, cleaning and childrearing as well.

 

Not only that, but during the depression she never turned anyone away from her door empty-handed. All she gave to the hungry men who came to the back door was a bun or two, but word got out that she never turned anyone away and also that the buns were delicious. My mother claims that the appearance of men at the back door asking for food was a daily occurrence.  All they ever got was a couple of buns- but they were tasty, homemade and often fresh out of the oven!

 

I am not sure what the modern day equivalent  of my grandnmother's generosity would be- but I am trying to follow her example.  Mostly I give $$ to organizations like Project Home, Philabundance and World Vision- but it doesn't seem to quite measure up. Sometimes when I have the time and think of it I make soup and take it over to the local homeless shelter.  In some ways the most effective thing that can be done is to work for more equitable sharing of the worlds resources. We, Quakers, have an organization dedicated to this. Try proclaim:  "God calls us to the right sharing of world resources, from the burdens of materialism and poverty into the abundance of God's love, to work for equity through partnership with our brothers and sister throughout the world."

 

Times are tough, here at home and around the globe. Be more generous than you feel you can. Research has also shown that it lifts the spirits of the giver as well. Generosity is also good for the heart and the soul despite the misuse of the admonition that it is better to give than to receive, which most of us had shoved down our throats inappropriately when we were too small to distinguish when that was true and when it was an excuse.  So give till it hurts, or makes you feel good; let's not forget that venerable karmic truth, what goes around, comes around.  Happy Holidays and here's to your generosity!

 

 

I have tried seriously to be a vegetarian twice in my life.  The first time was when I was in my twenties, in the 1970s. I read Fracis More Lappe's book, Diet for a Small Planet and took it quite to heart. Accordingly, then it was not about taking or not taking life- but about food distribution and poverty.  Feeding all those chickens and cattle all that grain that could and should be used to feed the starving folks in the third world was not OK with me. Just a few short weeks later I found myself in Kenya as a college student learning experientially. 

Two expperiences stand out concerning this topic.The second sememster in Kenya I taught at the elementary school of the Katheka Kai Coffee cooperative. I was invited to the wedding of a fellow teacher, held in the town not far from the Coop. I didn't know them well, but they were honored to have an American attend their wedding.  The wedding feast consisted of store bought white bread and bottles of Coca Cola, which they were also very proud of. Not long after that I was invited to dinner at the compound of the assistant manager of the Coop, Musioka. He and I had become friends. He was not much older than I but had two wives and several young children.  They lived in a compound that consisted of 3 thatched-roof huts, one for Musioka and one each for the wives and their respective chldren.  Unbeknownst to me they had slaughterd one of their goats for the occasion.  I ate the entire meal, including the meat, understanding what an honor it was. That was the end of being a vegetarian then.  I knew that I would never turn down meat offered in my honor, especially if it was offered by someone from another culture who had an income of fraction of what I lived on, even as a student.

Many years later, in 1996 I became a follower of Thich Nhat Hanh, a Vietnamese Buddhist monk and world reknown leader for peace.  After attending 3 week-long retreats, I decided I could no longer eat meat. Not long after that decision, I was on a trip to visit my high school roomate in the Pacific Northwest.  She and her husband were trying to stick to a low fat vegetarian diet.  I found that my energy dropped very low and at first attributed it to jet-lag and just traveling in general.  However, it only got worse. One day I was out shopping and I decided I just had to have some protein and bought some fried fish- and ate it.  My energy came right back up to its usual level! That was the end of that try.

I was in my early forties and I had begun to notice that I was being affected by seasonal allergies, which had not been a problem ever before.  I talked with one of my sisters about this and she recommended I checkout the blood type diet.  This is a theory that people should eat according to their blood type. I am an O, which is the original human blood type.  The O diet is basically what hunter-gatherers would eat: leafy green veggies and meat, especially red meat! I tried it and was amazed.  I lost weight, the allergies cleared up and I had loads of energy. The leading proponent of this diet, Dr. Peter D'Adamo, has advised people of the O blood type to be careful to eat only organic, grass-fed meat, with no hormones or pesticide residues, which, of course, is pretty darned expensive! But...my health trumped expense.

So I am a dedicated omnivore- that is I eat veggies and meat, and just about anthing else except wheat or things with much gluten in it.  You see, it turns out that O's have wheat intolerance, and don't like grains very much at all- or should I say grains don't like us? But I do suffer from the ominvore's dilemna, though not, perhaps exactly the one Micheal Pollen made famous.  I find that I can no longer eat factory farmed food especially meat.  I know too much! I've read about and seen movies about, feedlots and slaughter houses that can only be described as worse than concentration camps for animals! Egg 'factories' where chickens are caged in such cramped quarters they can't even turn around and the points of their beaks are seared off so the bored-out-of-their-minds birds will not peck each other to death. These animals are being tortured.

So why am I still a meat eater at all? Because I do not think that death is necessarily bad or constitutes torture.  In fact, I believe we 'kill' or destroy whatever we eat.  This is the nature of the universe we live in and especially the nature of life here on planet earth.  All life requires the taking of life to sustain itself.  I used to think that trees and plants did not do this, until I realized that plants destroy the photons they are able to get directly from the suns eminations, and they also 'drink'  water, with microbes in it, destroying many of them also as they use the molecules to create more of themselves.  Death is an intimate part of life- we create unhappiness when we try to deny this turth. Of course it makes sense to minimize this and certainly to draw lines beyond which we cannot go.  But, at least, in some sense these efforts are always arbitrary.

Torture is where I draw the line, or where I attempting to draw the line.  I also try to remember to thank everything I eat for its life, plantsas well as animals.  And I also try and rmember to thank all those whose effort bringis the food to my plate, all the 72 labors that made it possible (as some Buddhists remind us).  These days I am eating less meat and more vegetables. I almost never eat meat when I am not at home since I can never be sure that it was not tortured. That said, I can still not turn down what someone else has cooked for me as a guest in their home.  I am also opposed to wasting good food and I am deeply concerned about poverty, starvation and food security.

To that end I would like to propose a new movement: LOVEPAT; Local Ominvores & Vegetarians Ending Poverty & Animal Torture.  Our goal is food security for all through local democratically controlled food production everywhere accross the globe and an end to factory farming. 

"Eat food, not too much, mostly plants." Micheal Polen.  

Performance, Art & Preaching

| | Comments (2)
Growing up, in my family, certain things were given.  Preaching was bad, art was a common, almost insignificant, part of life, and performing was OK, as long as you were good at what you were doing. Let me explain. I grew up in a liberal Quaker household, my father was an artist, though teaching was what he did for a living, and both parents were fabulous dancers, especially my Mom. Our home was filled with paintings by my father and we ate and drank from the pottery he made.  Liberal, unprogrammed Quakers do not have preachers or clergy of any kind based on the experience that all people can have a direct relationship with the divine.

Recently some things have become a bit clearer, though this had led to some further confusion on my part as well. Great art is, not only beautiful, but evokes  awe, peace, compassion and sometimes a sense of communion in the audience. And there is something else, it points to and allows the audience to experience that which is beyond words. (Some of us call 'that which is beyond words' God.) Now I want to say something about 'the audience'.  Art is about communicating something no matter if it is music, visual art, dance etc.  Without an audience does art exist?  The Zen koan comes to mind. Koans are questions that don't have an answer, but are helpful in meditation.  The most famous one from centuries back is,"What is the sound of one hand clapping?" But what I am more interested in is my somewhat recent understanding that audiences are never merely observers or recipeints.

In fact, one of the reasons that celebreties have such messed up lives (besides the weirdness of no privacy) is that the power and radiance they feel while performing is completely misunderstood. In some way all performers, muscians, dancers, singers, actors and, yes, even preachers, in fact perhaps especially preachers, are: 1) channeling from that which is beyond words and 2) are the recipient of the radiance and power of each audience or congregation member whose attention is focussed on him/her. All performers have a largish dose of the "Look at me! LOOK AT ME!!!" syndrome.  To be honest, you need some of that in order to be a performer.  But that energy can and often does, eclipse the more significant message which is always, "Look! (Its not about me!) Look at where I am pointing!"

I forgot leaders and politicians also fall into the catagory of performers, and are subject to the same forces and energy.  Elected leaders are especially susceptible to the misuse as well as misunderstanding of these energies and powers because they must get themselves elected and then re-elected. (Of course the 'all-powerful MEDIA' has an influence here, but we are not going to go there, at least not now.) Because of the reasons mentioned above folks like Hitler can be so powerful, the audience is essentially handing over their power, their light, their energy to the leader/speaker and can, therefore be vulnerable to being manipulated for good or ill.

I discovered in high school that I am good at public speaking, and that I even enjoy it- but only if I am speaking about something I care about. Much more recently I have felt called to preach, but am still struggling to understand what this means.  Just now as I am writing this a new understanding is evolving. Its not that I am called to preach, so much as a deep affirmation that I am a performer of the speaking/writing/preaching variety. (I also am quite a dancer. In fact, in my younger years, when I was a community organizer I used to say, when complimented on my dancing prowess, "After the revolution, I will be a dancer." Of course, being a Quaker, I was referring to the non-violent revolution that me and my friends knew was coming.) This only makes sense to me in the context of the above understandings. That always, if I am being true to my gift, I am channeling from that which is beyond words and that I am also the recipient of the light, love and radiance of my audience/congregation.  In other words,'its not about me'. Yet curiously, though it is ultimately not about me, it must be communicated via my experience.  Like a stained glass window, the light comes from beyond the window itself, but the beauty is enhanced by the "stains" of the glass and perhaps also, at times, the light, itself, is too bright to be looked at directly and the beauty can only be perceived when it is softened and sperated into the common colors that we humans can actually see with our eyes.

I have learned some of this from observing and hearing about the African-American church. It is much clearer there that the preacher is not preaching alone.  The congregation is much more actively involved.  In fact, in many churches their are decons whose job it is to pray for the preacher while s/he is preaching and to correct, cajole and encourage the preacher to preach the 'word'. In his book, The Great Awakening, Jim Wallis tells a story.  He had been invited to preach at Ebenezer Baptist Church on the first annual national holiday of the birthday of MLK, the Church where both ML KIng and his father "Daddy" King had been ministers.

"I was excited but nervous. when I stepped up to the histroic pulpit, I froze. ... 'What was a young white kid from Detroit doing in this pulpit? I was a litllte tentative as I began. 'Well MLKing Jr. was for justice and. . . p-p-peace,' I stammered, 'and probably we should be too.' It was something short of  powerful.

"But then, from the lower left side of the church, a voice boomed back at me, 'Oh help him Lord, help him! C.mon young man, you're supposed to preach.' So I started to- a little. 'Aw, you're not there yet!' he bellowed. Of course he was enacting the 'call and responce' tradition of the black church, which I have learned to love. ... the old man proceeded with a littany of 'well', 'yes sir' , 'mercy, mercy' and 'preach it now' and lots of 'amens' until I was proclaiming, prancing and sweating- preaching my heart out until I was thoroughly exhausted when I finally finished. Afterwards, I rushed down to my amen corner, whose name was Deacon Johnson. 'You just pulled that sermon out of me!' I exclaimed, breathless. Standing tall, he put his hand on my shoulders and smiled at me. 'Son,' he said 'I've raised up many a preacher in my time.'" (p.11-12)    

What is the point of preaching or any performance, anyway? The point is to help people by pointing the way, inspiring them to get on their knees, or jump up from their seats, or quietly feel the Presence of that which is beyond words.  Even in pop concerts the audience can experience a communion that goes beyond words, takes them, takes us into that spaciousness where all things are possible, all problems have solutions and we are mysteriously in and of it at once.  This is made possible because the people themselves, through directing their attention, away from themselves and toward the performer/speaker/preacher, they are enabled to give their light, energy, the very radiance of    themselves to the performer who in turn is enabled, empowered to channel ever more acurately from that which is beyond words.

In the words of Michael Jackson "The key to being a wonderful writer [composer] is not to write. Leave room for God to walk in the room. You just get out of the way."(Ebony 12/07)

Amen!

Are We Evovling?

| | Comments (4)

I saw a movie last night, a documentary, called the Horse Boy, that has set me pondering questions, like the title above. Some of the questions make me uncomfortable, for they challenge some of my political correctness and my perceived need to please everyone. But I feel compelled to ask and to pose some possible answers.

 

Why is there an epidemic of autism? What do people with Down syndrome have to teach us? What is the role of transgendered folk, especially those that remain physically one gender but feel an inner compulsion, or a command from a higher power, to dress as the other? And what does any of this have to do with the oldest religion in the world?

 

What I learned last night:

1. Some of the most respected professionals in the field say that it is seeming more and more likely that autism has a genetic component, but that environmental factors, including environmental pollutants, such as heavy metals, may be the triggers for autism to express itself in an individual.

2. In the surviving cultures that still practice shamanism, virtually all of the shamans exhibited austistic-spectrim behaviors  and/or had an early illness that they survived which left them 'different' from their peers.  However, in these aboriginal cultures the differences were/are revered and these children were/are then apprenticed to shamans.

3. People with autism often seem to have a special connection with animals.

 

Some other things I have recently learned:

1. In some Native American cultures transgenderd/cross-dressing folk are revered and are often also shamans.  They were/are, especially, helpful to couples that are having marital troubles since they experience life as both male and female.

2. In her newest book, The Case for God, Karen Armstrong starts off with a chapter entitled Homo Religiosus and a look into the most recent understandings of the religion of our oldest human relations, shamanism. "From the very beginning, it seems, religious life was rooted in acknowlegdment of the tragic fact that life depends on the destruction of other creatures." (1)   " In these traditional societies hunters do not feel that the species are distinct or permanent categories: men can become animals and animals human. Shamans have bird and animal guardians and can converse with the beasts that are revered as messengers of higher powers." (2)

 

One thing I know from my own experience raising a daughter with Down syndrome: Her disability, including the limits that seem to come with it, have taught me much about being human and challenge some of the basic assumptions of our fast-passed, competitive culture that values doing more than being.

 

Perhaps these folk at the margins, whose abilities seem lacking, or tendencies seem suspect can help us recognize what is most needed now as we head into this next era of human culture and endeavor. It is clear to me that we must now learn how to live with our animal and plant brothers and sisters in a way that does not denigrate them to mere objects meant for destruction or extinction, or to be turned into stuff for human consumption. The very Earth, itself, which is withering before our eyes, is calling us to think and act and BE in new ways. 

 

In my view, one thing this does not mean is for those with autism, or Down syndrome, or even those who are transgendered, or called to be transgendered,  should be made to fit in, or be as like 'typical' folk as possible.  There are gifts and talents and ways of seeing as well as ways of being among these folk that need to be appreciated, if not revered, respected and learned from. Some of the lessons could save us from destroying this beautiful planet that is our only home.

 

My daughter has made it clear that she does not want to have children.  We humans are now called to restrain ourselves in this department. Could the attraction toward same gendered folk be a sign and a model for us to lessen our procreation as a species, while upping our creativity in other areas? We need so much creative energy to solve all the problems facing us today- economic, environmental and human relations-wise. (Adoption may be the best option; I'm talking cross species, cross cultural, even parts of the planet like streams or lakes- not to mention our next door neighbors! But this for for another post!)

 

In some ways my daughter functions as a 5 or 6 year old, though she is 26. Her intellect is not her most obvious gift. Her pace of life can drive me nearly crazy- I call it, "leisurely in the extreme", but when I slow down to her speed, life really is more manageable AND more enjoyable. Isn't that one of the things the world needs now?  Sure she is great at loving, and we sure as heck need that- but slowing down may be even harder to do!

 

Maybe I'm trying to draw too many conclusions.  Maybe I am lumping things together that don't belong.  Maybe I am out of my mind... but one thing I am sure of is that all people - no matter who they are- have something of value to offer and it usually has to do with their differences.  This is true, even for us folk who think of ourselves as normal, or typical.  My close association with Kate, my daughter, who happens to have Down syndrome, has helped me see that in some way we all try to pass.  We try to hide our differences and especially our difficulties, but it is just those things that are often our most precious gifts to each other and the world.

 

And, NOW, we need those gifts, perhaps more than ever before.


Ring the bells that still can ring

Forget your perfect offering

There is a crack, a crack in everything

That's how the light gets in.

(Anthem, Leonard Cohen)

 

(1) The Case For God, Karen Armstrong, p.6

(2) The Case For God, Karen Armstrong, p.5

 

 

If you have the time.  I have had that sticker on my door, placed so I can see it on my way out.  EVERYWHERE IS WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE, IF YOU HAVE THE TIME. It makes me smile, mostly at myself, for I, often, don't make the time and then see it as I am rushing out the door, too late to even take the trolley, let alone walk.  Still over the 4 or 5 years its been there I have steadily increased the umber of places I walk to, while lessening, or consolidating the ones I drive to.

Of course, the fact that one of our daughters has one of our cars in North Carolina for the summer and the other was stolen, badly damaged and in the shop for a while, helped move me a little more quickly in this direction, rather than at the snails pace I had previously maintained. I have the hardest time when it comes to my children, two of them are still living at home- though not for long.  We will be experiencing the proverbial empty nest in less than a year. 

My seventeen year old takes public transportation to and from school everyday, but gets a ride with neighbors to the trolley tunnel about 10 blocks away, a good half hour earlier than she needs to, so that she can ride in with her friends.  On days when that doesn't work out, I drive her the 10 blocks.  Although this goes against, my principles, since she could catch the trolley just 2 blocks from our house, this is both what she is accustomed to and an opportunity to spend a few minutes with her alone which I almost never get otherwise.  Occaisionally I will even drive her all the way to school, just to get to be with her and talk a bit. These times have been precious, often allowing her to open up and share a troubling concern and even tears. So I put up with the incongruency- knowing she wil be gone all too soon. 

On the days that she does require a lift from me, she is often running late and comes bounding down the stairs calling out, "Mom, can ou give me a ride to the trolley?"  School was still in session  for the 2 weeks when we had no car at all.  One morning she came bounding down the satirs and started in on her usual, Mom, can you.." then there was a 2 second pause, then "quickly borrow a car and drive me to the trolley?" I laughed in estonishment. Told her to call our neighbors to see if theirs was avialable.  No go.  I then called some other neighbors about a block away.  There college-age son was home and his jalopy was available.  So we high-tailed it over there and I drove her-all the way to school!

Not only does remembering and retelling this incident make me laugh, or smile to myself- it has taught me a valuable lesson. There are enough cars in our neighborhood among our friends that we could probably get along without any car at all and certainly don't need two! My husband and I don't see eye-to-eye on this yet, but I can tell a change is coming; one that involves, at least one fewer car and more walking!
Yesterday morning my 17 year old asked me to edit the draft of her history paper due upon arrival at school. It was about the relationship our country, the US of A, has had with a certain democracy in a region where democracy is rare and the country in question is surrounded by hostile states. I made gammer corrections and offered a few stylistic suggestions. While doing that, I began to wonder if this particular country was a democracy. Since I was doing so out loud, my daughter expressed her annoyance, stating clearly that whether or not this  country was a democracy was not the subject of the paper. I couldn't deny the truth of that, but I could not stop myself from pondering this question.  When a country denies basic rights to some of its citizens, can it still claim to be a democracy? If you are required to be a member of a certain religion in order to have rights, can it still be a democracy? Are theocracy and democracy necessarily at odds with each other?

We did not consider South Africa a democracy until the Blacks and Coloureds there were given the vote. But was that because the majority of the population was disenfranchised, rather than a minority?  If we take democracy to mean that all adult citizens have the right to vote in the processes that determine the leaders and governments of the state, then was the US not a democracy until 1920 when women were given the right to vote? Wow! that would seem weird. But in the very beginning of our so-called democracy, only white men who owned land had the right to vote.  Hmmm, this complicates things a bit. What exactly do we mean when we use the term democracy?

In Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, democracy is defined (in part) as: 1. a. government by the people, esp. rule of the majority.  b. a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usu. involving periodic free elections 2. a political unit that has a democratic government....5. the absence of hereditary or arbitrary class distinctions or privileges. However, the New International Webster's Pocket Dictionary defines it as: 1. government in  which political control is shared by all the people, either directly or by representatives who they elect. 2. a state so governed. 3. political, legal or social equality.

So, when Lincoln spoke those famous words, "of the people, for the people, by the people", what did he mean?  People is a gender and race neutral word.  Heck, its an age neutral word for that matter.  He didn't use the word citizen, nor man. The two dictionaries above, have, together, 15 definitions for people!  Among the first are: 1. the aggregate of humans beings living under the same government. 2. human beings, persons... there are also several definitions that are more restrictive, such as, the members of a family or kinship, or: subjects of a ruler or government. Number 7 in the Webster's Collegiate, defines people as, the body of enfranchised citizens of a state.

I am not sure that the US was a democracy before 1920, or that the unnamed state above is now.  I know that some people would say that its not a democracy unless there are at least 2 political parties, in other words a one party state cannot be a real democracy. But I am not sure that I have come much closer to understanding what is commonly assumed when the  word democracy is used, other than a vaguely defined form of government that is not a dictatorship or monarchy, where at least a significant minority have the right to vote to elect the leaders and government of their country.




The Mindful Quaker

| | Comments (3)
My 20 year old daughter had to practically drag me kicking and screaming to Blue Cliff Monastery for a retreat in January. Well, the kicking and screaming was all internal, since I was supposedly doing it to support her. Much to my surprise, I found it meaningful, refreshing and FUN! I also realized that ten years ago, when I stopped having a mindfulness meditation group meet at my home in favor of devoting myself to my Quaker Meeting, I had thrown too much of the baby out with the bath water, so to speak.

About 13 years ago, I attended the first of 3 week-long retreats with the venerable Thich Nhat Hahn and the monks and nuns of Plum Village (and 1800 other folks!). Was it serendipity or the hand of God (please note: I use "God" as short-hand for that which we call God.), that this first retreat came just weeks after my marriage suddenly, at least, sudden to me, came unglued?  (Perhaps even more amazing, a month or so before the truth-telling that evaporated the glue, I had had a life changing spiritual awakening!) At any rate, it was amazingly helpful to be surrounded by calm, loving people who listened deeply and didn't seem to mind the waterfall of tears every time I attempted to share anything. Despite the distress I was in, I learned the beauty and usefulness of extended periods of silence, of mindful eating and walking meditation.  Some days, when the noble silence ended after breakfast, I did not want to start speaking again for quite awhile. 

There was some way that I felt I had come home and was not surprised at the feelings I had of wanting to become a nun and live this way the rest of my life. Since I was still married and had 3 children between the ages of 5 and 14, this, of course, was not remotely a possibility. The organizers had thoughtfully arranged the daily small groups, geographically.  That is, all 15 people in my group were from the Philadelphia area. About 8 of us decided to continue meeting as a meditation group, weekly- and in my house, so I was committed. Thai, (teacher)
 as Thich Naht Hahn is affectionately called, said and has written over and over again that if you are already committed to your own faith, take what you learn and use it to deepen your own.  After nearly 3 years of being co-organizer of the group, I realized that being a member of my Quaker Meeting, my faith community required a marriage-like commitment, e.g. monogamy.  I had to choose, and Central Philadelphia Monthly Meeting won, hands down.


With my encouragement the whole family, including my husband,  had attended 2 of the 3 retreats mentioned above which we all enjoyed and benefitted from. But our large (by Quaker standards) faith community had so much to offer and, through the crisis in our marriage, we attended more regularly, helping to glue us all back together in a more healthy bond. (There was also a year of physical separation, years of individual therapy and marriage counseling...) My own personal meditation practice has waxed and waned, though not disappeared.  As I have become more and more engaged in the Quaker way, I have explored more traditional practices of prayer and familiarized myself with more of the delights and wonders of Quaker practice- the annoyances I had already become familiar with since I was born and raised in this faith.

My journey, which at times resembles a meandering country road and at others a roller coaster ride, has lead me to pursue Jesus, Christ Jesus or the Christ principle which has existed always, as an aspect of God. It has lead me to seek reconciliation with early Friends (Quakers) and those who currently recognize Jesus/Christ as the center of their faith and practice. However, I remain a Universalist Friend, which means I not only acknowledge that of God in every individual, but also in every religion, every attempt to get closer to God, every attempt at translating those untranslatable experiences of the Divine into human language. I also recognize that every religion has a lot of bath water along with a genuine baby, including my own.

So, am I a Buddhist Quaker? I don't think so.  In exactly the way that I am not a Christian Quaker. The words and examples of both Jesus and Buddha move and inspire me- not to mention elude and, sometimes, confuse me. But, for me neither of them is God.  Only God is.  Sometimes I think of them as aspects of God, but mostly as examples of God-filled humans who show us the way in this life, who offer us words and practices that can protect us and all life, help us live more in tune with the Divine order and bring us closer to God, moment by moment, breath by breath.  I am grateful, eternally in each of their debt- but I do not worship either of them.  I worship God.  Therefore, I dub myself a mindful Quaker, a Friend who attempts to live in the present, wonderful moment- this moment which is a gift from God. So be it.

About Amy


Amy was born in 1952 to Quaker parents in Philadelphia, PA. She is the mother of 2 young adults and one teenager. She and her husband, David who is a physician, have been married 27 years. Amy lives, works and writes in West Philadelphia, though a large part of her heart resides in Africa. More about Amy.

Flickr Photos

Favorite Links: